
















|
|
|
What is
Cow Protection?
In PDF Pamphlet Form

by Madhava Priya dasi
Hearing the term "Cow Protection," people
typically have one of two reactions. Some think protection is for endangered
species, and since there are lots of cows, it's better to concentrate on
whales. Others think it may be some pagan worship of animals - the "sacred
cow" image.

THE ACTUAL PHILOSOPHICAL REASON FOR COW
PROTECTION IS VERY SIMPLE: First of all, all living entities should be
protected from slaughter and other violence at the hands of humans. Not only
cows, but animals have SOULS the same as we do. All are children of God, all
are dear to Him.
With this view in mind, it can be seen
that slaughter is a form of MURDER.
The cow, however, is our MOTHER. Vedic
philosophy teaches there are 7 mothers: 1) the birth mother, 2) the nurse,
3) the wife of the father (if she is not the birth mother), 4) the wife of
the king, 5) the wife of the spiritual master, 6) the earth, and 7) the cow.
You may wonder why the cow is considered one of the 7 mothers. Well, it is
because she gives her milk to nourish us.

All mothers should hold a position of
respect, and since one does not kill and eat one's mother, the cow should
not be killed and eaten. Likewise, the bull is our father because he can
plow the earth to produce food grains. One does not kill and eat one's
father and mother - not even when they are old and less economically useful.
5000 years ago, Lord Krishna, the Supreme Personality of
Godhead, appeared on earth to protect His devotees and to demonstrate His
pastimes. Among those pastimes was his childhood role as a cowherd boy. The
cows were very dear to Him because of their affectionate and gentle nature
as well as their contributions to human society, and He was kind to them in
return and protected them. We should follow His example.

In practice the first principle of cow
protection, surprisingly, is OX EMPLOYMENT.
A mistake is made when only the cow is
considered because typically her main usefulness is seen as milk production,
and she won't give milk unless she first has a calf. Since half of all
calves are bulls, the result will be a lot of excess bovine population. The
expense of feeding them will be a deficit to the farmer. Unless employed as
oxen, their only economic usefulness will be in their slaughter to produce
meat.
The modern system of agriculture sees no
other economically viable means of management. And most people, accustomed
to this viewpoint and seeing no alternative, will throw up their hands and
agree, even if they'd prefer a less violent solution. But that is only
because they don't have the facts. They don't know that the overall value of
the ox is greater when he is utilized for work than when he's slaughtered
for meat.

The present system is full
of ironies and very wasteful. Everyone laments the loss of the small family
farm. But economic forces today require quantity control - which is
dependent on expensive tractors, polluting fossil fuels, chemical
fertilizers, and heavy mortgages - and the small farmer is driven out of
business.
Yet,
beef production is subsidized in countries like USA and India. To produce
beef there is a disproportionate expenditure of the Earth's resources. In a
world with increasing population and mass starvation, producing one calorie
of flesh (beef, pork, or chicken) requires 11-17 calories of feed. 78
calories of fossil fuel are needed to produce 1 calorie of protein from
beef. Two-thirds of Central America's rainforest have been destroyed to
supply beef. *
A BETTER SYSTEM would be rearranging the
components. First, breed cows not to provide milk with calves as the
by-product, but to provide a team of oxen for every family farm with milk as
the by-product. There will be neither excess milk nor excess calves. The
oxen will be out in the pastures eating simply, and naturally fertilizing
the soil, saving the farmer the cost of the tractor, fuel, and fertilizer.
The oxen will be quite content to use their big muscles in such wholesome
work, and the humans can become healthy vegetarians. As for the government,
if it wants to subsidize something, why not the small family farm instead of
the beef industry? The beef industry may have a powerful lobby, but who
wants all that heart disease, diabetes, colon cancer, not to mention all
that bad karma from killing innocent animals!
Don't we all hanker for a simpler,
cleaner, more wholesome, less violent Earth?

THE OX IS THE BACKBONE
OF THE FARM,
NOT THE SOUPBONE.
*
worldwatch.org, madcowboy.com,
|